CoinmicoCoinmico

Whale tracker

Who is actually moving size on-chain. Every trade behind these rankings was decoded by our own chain indexers and tied to the address that signed it, so the page describes trading we watched — not balances, and not anyone's identity.

Attributed volume (24h)
$6,294,777,398,910,190,000,000,000,000,000,000.0Q
8,889 swaps tied to a signer
Wallets tracked
2,499
3 held back as automated
Largest trade (24h)
$6,294,777,398,910,190,000,000,000,000,000,000.0Q
Single swap, priced on our index
Tracking since
Sep 1, 2026
1 day of attribution

Size first: how much a wallet moved through the pools we index in 30 days, how regularly it traded, and how many assets it spread that across.

#WalletWhale scoreVolume 30d
10x5B43…EFd1
Ethereum
84$2.47M
20xF04a…13A1
Base
73$1.32M
30x9eb9…BeaF
Ethereum
70$721.0K
40x81DC…B824
Ethereum
69$627.5K
50xeBed…7255
Ethereum
68$575.0K
60xb36c…56ce
Ethereum
68$507.1K
70xbc73…A21C
Ethereum
68$241.8K
80xC8DF…eBfe
Ethereum
66$509.0K
90xae2F…aE13
Ethereum
65$613.8K
100x5130…8046
Ethereum
64$522.0K
110x58A4…e836
Ethereum
64$360.6K
120x981C…f58d
Ethereum
64$198.4K
130xeAA9…8e51
Ethereum
63$378.8K
14THS55W…n2qv
Tron
62$959.0K
150x867b…14D3
Ethereum
62$825.1K
160xd270…5A53
Ethereum
62$586.0K
170xa971…4970
Base
62$134.8K
180x517a…18A8
Base
61$6,294,777,398,910,190,000,000,000,000,000,000.0Q
190x2c93…c990
Ethereum
61$675.7K
200x5fA6…64d4
Ethereum
61$423.8K
210x6f0A…3926
Ethereum
61$312.3K
220xa668…fe04
Ethereum
61$202.0K
230x12DD…756c
Ethereum
60$538.9K
240x6AE8…4F44
Ethereum
60$178.3K
250xD6f4…667c
Ethereum
59$524.8K
26TK2nJV…CBAQ
Tron
59$175.2K
270x3f7B…3B00
Arbitrum
58$67.17K
280xf686…d946
Base
57$1.76M
290x977e…b1e1
Ethereum
56$684.4K
300xff59…A77E
Ethereum
56$206.2K
31TVFxAQ…wAoc
Tron
55$685.6K
320x5934…1321
Ethereum
55$664.9K
33THkZi2…QtUx
Tron
54$644.7K
340xCC50…B0E1
Arbitrum
54$72.11K
350xA92C…1F66
Ethereum
53$3.50M
360xF4Db…9C33
Ethereum
53$2.86M
370xa2cf…565a
Ethereum
52$116.4K
380x1CfA…08A0
Arbitrum
52$72.85K
390xAaeB…6A34
Arbitrum
52$72.49K
400x15b1…A729
Arbitrum
52$66.08K
410x2568…ee4B
Arbitrum
52$61.17K
420xf7e5…75F2
Ethereum
52$57.15K
430xC933…6DfD
Arbitrum
51$150.1K
440xdC76…6D78
OP Mainnet
51$108.2K
450xE75e…1B49
ArbitrumBase
51$77.40K
460x7Bb4…7266
Arbitrum
51$73.12K
470xF421…3385
Arbitrum
51$61.90K
480x2559…9A2C
ArbitrumBase
50$124.1K
490xc210…68FC
ArbitrumBase
50$91.40K
500xEA76…A491
Arbitrum
50$72.24K

Large trades

≥ $10K · last 24 hours

How these scores are measured

Our indexers decode swaps on the pools we watch across the chains we run nodes against, price each one on our own index, and — above a $1,000 floor — resolve the wallet that signed the transaction rather than the router that appears in the log. Those trades are folded into a position per wallet and asset every five minutes: what was bought, what was sold, and the profit realised on the part that closed, valued at average cost.

The whale score weighs the size a wallet moved in thirty days (60%), how regularly it traded (25%) and how many assets it spread that across (15%). The early entry score weighs how soon after a pool opened the wallet bought (50%), how many times it did that (30%) and what those early positions returned (20%). A buy within an hour of a pool opening counts as an early entry.

What this is not. We cannot see exchange fills, transfers or bridges, so a wallet's real profit and its holdings are outside what we measure — only trades we observed are counted. Early timing is only shown for pools whose creation we witnessed; for anything older the answer stays a dash rather than a guess. And a high score is behaviour, not proof of anything: an address may be a market maker, a bot, a deployer or an exchange. We keep automatically trading wallets in the data but hold them out of the rankings, with the reason recorded, instead of deleting them quietly.